Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Christian Lindell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Etcheverry vs Lindell analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Christian Lindell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Etcheverry 1 - 1 Lindell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Etcheverry has won 51.12% of points on their second serve, while Lindell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Etcheverry, in recent form, has won 50.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lindell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.04% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Etcheverry has saved 66.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lindell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Etcheverry has won 50.79% of matches played (W/L 32/ 31), with Lindell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 290/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Lindell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 415/ 271), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55.88% of matches (W/L 19/ 15), where as Lindell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Etcheverry winning 1 times and Lindell being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 2 and Lindell winning 2. The last match between Etcheverry and Lindell was at the Cordoba Open - Cordoba, 21-02-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Etcheverry and Lindell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Etcheverry winning 0 times and Lindell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Etcheverry winning 0, and Lindell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Etcheverry has played against opponents with an average rank of 144.54 while Lindell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Etcheverry has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lindell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Etcheverry has converted 38.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lindell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
29
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
177
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
64% (332-190)
Career Total W/L
59% (442-303)
54% (19-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,160,450
Career Prize Money
$68,305
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Etcheverry VS Lindell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Christian Lindell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:8 | 1:32:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (75/107) | 53% (56/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (51/75) | 68% (38/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 34% (11/32) | 51% (25/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (42/105) | 42% (45/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Etcheverry VS Lindell H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Christian Lindell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (19/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (48/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (445/399) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (17/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 162 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 148.51 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1693/2540) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1187/1693) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (433/847) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (96/248) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (964/2543) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (14/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (17/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | 6-4 1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 7-6(8) 1-6 0-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-7(8) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Cazaux
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
79 of
128)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Luciano Darderi
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Dominik Koepfer
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Christian Lindell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Christian Lindell
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Christian Lindell
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Patrik Rikl
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Christian Lindell
41%
(
46 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
34 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christian Lindell
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Etcheverry Vs Lindell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
